<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website layout dimensions today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/</link>
	<description>Read about Website Development, Online Marketing and Web Hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-102522</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-102522</guid>
		<description>Yes right, this hard to do, try to use a stretched background (width:100%)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes right, this hard to do, try to use a stretched background (width:100%)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ehcomunicacion</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-102520</link>
		<dc:creator>ehcomunicacion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-102520</guid>
		<description>i have problems with pages made by Adobe flash with a big resolution. It is almost impossible view all website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have problems with pages made by Adobe flash with a big resolution. It is almost impossible view all website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eworldhost</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-99971</link>
		<dc:creator>eworldhost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-99971</guid>
		<description>I think you raised a very valid point. Portable devices are here to stay and the number of people using them is only going to increase. I think the best way we can handle it at this point is to create different stylesheets - however it all depends on whether the client is willing to pay for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you raised a very valid point. Portable devices are here to stay and the number of people using them is only going to increase. I think the best way we can handle it at this point is to create different stylesheets &#8211; however it all depends on whether the client is willing to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-99653</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-99653</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

you don&#039;t need a third party service ;) some tiny JS snippet will do the job:


&lt;code&gt;if (screen.width&gt;=1024 &amp;&amp; screen.height&gt;=768) {
 window.location=&quot;highres.html&quot;;
} else {
  window.location=&quot;lowres.html&quot;;
}&lt;/code&gt;




of just include the right CSS style sheet after the resolution is detected.

But anyway you have to develop multiple websites to serve all the resolutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>you don&#8217;t need a third party service <img src='http://cdn.web-development-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  some tiny JS snippet will do the job:</p>
<p><code>if (screen.width>=1024 &#038;&#038; screen.height>=768) {<br />
 window.location="highres.html";<br />
} else {<br />
  window.location="lowres.html";<br />
}</code></p>
<p>of just include the right CSS style sheet after the resolution is detected.</p>
<p>But anyway you have to develop multiple websites to serve all the resolutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-99651</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-99651</guid>
		<description>when we develop a site, we use a service such as handsetdetection.com which then allows us to detect the device screen size and then display the correct format and resolution. This then allows us to have a standard view, iphone and blackberry versions and a normal mobile phone version of the site. Our CMS handles the template changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when we develop a site, we use a service such as handsetdetection.com which then allows us to detect the device screen size and then display the correct format and resolution. This then allows us to have a standard view, iphone and blackberry versions and a normal mobile phone version of the site. Our CMS handles the template changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-97574</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-97574</guid>
		<description>I read similar article also named layout dimensions today &#124; Web Development Blog, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read similar article also named layout dimensions today | Web Development Blog, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-95529</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-95529</guid>
		<description>I think the increasing usage of smaller devices adds a valuable element to the ongoing screen size debate. 

2 other factors that I think are important are:

screen real estate usage, and
line-length for readability

I often hear people quoting resolution stats, but what those numbers don&#039;t tell us is how much of the screen the browser is actually displaying. Some users don&#039;t open the browser to its full size, others may keep their histories, delicious boomarks or other content open in a side window (thus narrowing the viewport), while others, like me, have extra toolbars installed that significantly reduce the vertical space. Thus even a user with a big screen may not be seeing the whole screen. 

Line-length is something that becomes a challenge with liquid layouts. We know shorter line lengths are easier to read, but they are far easier to control in a fixed environment. With a liquid layout one can fix the width of columns to prevent text from stretching out too wide, but that often looks weird as well. Yet if we let the text stretch it can become very hard to read. And of course we all know the challenges of designing something that looks good at varying sizes. 

I don&#039;t know that the debate will ever end, but I think as long as we keep reminding people that it is not only a question of screen size, we&#039;re on the right track.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the increasing usage of smaller devices adds a valuable element to the ongoing screen size debate. </p>
<p>2 other factors that I think are important are:</p>
<p>screen real estate usage, and<br />
line-length for readability</p>
<p>I often hear people quoting resolution stats, but what those numbers don&#8217;t tell us is how much of the screen the browser is actually displaying. Some users don&#8217;t open the browser to its full size, others may keep their histories, delicious boomarks or other content open in a side window (thus narrowing the viewport), while others, like me, have extra toolbars installed that significantly reduce the vertical space. Thus even a user with a big screen may not be seeing the whole screen. </p>
<p>Line-length is something that becomes a challenge with liquid layouts. We know shorter line lengths are easier to read, but they are far easier to control in a fixed environment. With a liquid layout one can fix the width of columns to prevent text from stretching out too wide, but that often looks weird as well. Yet if we let the text stretch it can become very hard to read. And of course we all know the challenges of designing something that looks good at varying sizes. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that the debate will ever end, but I think as long as we keep reminding people that it is not only a question of screen size, we&#8217;re on the right track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelli Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-95184</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-95184</guid>
		<description>people get used to the new technologies with time....so whether it is a palm-top or a desk top computer internet still remains to be vital part of our lives and we are bound to surf the net. Yes with the upcoming technologies new concepts of web design are also coming up so that both are in line with each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people get used to the new technologies with time&#8230;.so whether it is a palm-top or a desk top computer internet still remains to be vital part of our lives and we are bound to surf the net. Yes with the upcoming technologies new concepts of web design are also coming up so that both are in line with each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warenwirtschaft</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-93084</link>
		<dc:creator>Warenwirtschaft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-93084</guid>
		<description>We have been using 1024 px Design (a little less in fact) lately, but i always have a bad feeling about it. You are right with all those small gadgets that have a small resolution and the development will split in the future. Huge screens for the desktop and small screen for mobile. We will definitely have to switch designs for the actual user in the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been using 1024 px Design (a little less in fact) lately, but i always have a bad feeling about it. You are right with all those small gadgets that have a small resolution and the development will split in the future. Huge screens for the desktop and small screen for mobile. We will definitely have to switch designs for the actual user in the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-91917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/website-layout-dimensions-today/#comment-91917</guid>
		<description>I have a Nokia N800 that I surf on quite a bit. I have Gecko 1.9 on it, so web pages render fine, but occasionally I come across pages that aren&#039;t optimized for the 800x480 screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Nokia N800 that I surf on quite a bit. I have Gecko 1.9 on it, so web pages render fine, but occasionally I come across pages that aren&#8217;t optimized for the 800&#215;480 screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 26/36 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 478/482 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.web-development-blog.com

Served from: www.web-development-blog.com @ 2012-02-08 10:25:33 -->
