<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google guidelines against modern web development?</title>
	<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/</link>
	<description>Web development tutorials, SEO articles and PHP script resources</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-26454</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-26454</guid>
		<description>I wish in Scotland we could get developers who can program for the web - rather than wanting to make games, or applets all the time. Every developer I seem to work with now thinks dotnet is great and has never read googles terms and conditions. Spend time training them up more than anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish in Scotland we could get developers who can program for the web - rather than wanting to make games, or applets all the time. Every developer I seem to work with now thinks dotnet is great and has never read googles terms and conditions. Spend time training them up more than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-25516</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-25516</guid>
		<description>I almost always use scripts to show text and links if a plugin isn't available on the client side. Yes I do make this SEO friendly but it's hardly fair to get penalised given that I'm not keyword jamming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost always use scripts to show text and links if a plugin isn&#8217;t available on the client side. Yes I do make this SEO friendly but it&#8217;s hardly fair to get penalised given that I&#8217;m not keyword jamming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Visinoni</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-25191</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Visinoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-25191</guid>
		<description>Who says they don't?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says they don&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WraithStrider</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-25060</link>
		<dc:creator>WraithStrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-25060</guid>
		<description>I think google should employ human evaluators on their suspected sites</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google should employ human evaluators on their suspected sites</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnsons</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-20738</link>
		<dc:creator>johnsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-20738</guid>
		<description>True-you are right,I am with your view.Hiding text is only furnishing glamour to sites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True-you are right,I am with your view.Hiding text is only furnishing glamour to sites&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Visinoni</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-19908</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Visinoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-19908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So what if you are simply doing something like the following to display an image representing the text?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My website&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;code&gt;#my-website {background: url(images/mysite.gif) no-repeat left top;}
#my-website span {display:none}&lt;/code&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think it's kind of silly to punish somebody for this, but then again it must be quite difficult to tell what is blackhat and what isn't. This is an issue I am always worried about because occasionally I use techniques like this. I learned to do it from CSSZenGarden, and I always thought they knew what they were doing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what if you are simply doing something like the following to display an image representing the text?</p>
<p>My website</p>
<p><code>#my-website {background: url(images/mysite.gif) no-repeat left top;}<br />
#my-website span {display:none}</code>
<p>I think it&#8217;s kind of silly to punish somebody for this, but then again it must be quite difficult to tell what is blackhat and what isn&#8217;t. This is an issue I am always worried about because occasionally I use techniques like this. I learned to do it from CSSZenGarden, and I always thought they knew what they were doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Developer</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18697</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18697</guid>
		<description>I think the main purpose of their guidelines is to tell the people to not to hide any text from the visitor, no matter what the technology used to hide the text. Obviously they will not write all the possible ways of hiding text... bottom line is, hiding the text is black hat, not matter how you hide it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main purpose of their guidelines is to tell the people to not to hide any text from the visitor, no matter what the technology used to hide the text. Obviously they will not write all the possible ways of hiding text&#8230; bottom line is, hiding the text is black hat, not matter how you hide it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18213</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18213</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;hehe, according the Google Guidelines is this a kind of Black Hat SEO:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(maybe I should warn Eric) ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, according the Google Guidelines is this a kind of Black Hat SEO:</p>
<p><a href="http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html" rel="nofollow">http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html</a></p>
<p>(maybe I should warn Eric) <img src='http://www.web-development-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18212</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18212</guid>
		<description>Got your point. I wouldn't do that but in many cases you can :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got your point. I wouldn&#8217;t do that but in many cases you can <img src='http://www.web-development-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18209</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 13:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/google-guidelines-against-modern-web-development/#comment-18209</guid>
		<description>...yes right, not using them is always possible ;) Would you use an XML request for some explaining text box which will show up onMouseOver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;yes right, not using them is always possible <img src='http://www.web-development-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> Would you use an XML request for some explaining text box which will show up onMouseOver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
