<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get your Flash website high ranked at Google</title>
	<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/</link>
	<description>Web development tutorials, SEO articles and PHP script resources</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Consult</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-95233</link>
		<dc:creator>Consult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-95233</guid>
		<description>I still prefere not to use flash and that stuff if it is not readed. Traditional valid HTML pages (even generated by PHP,ASP) and so on are still better for google than any flash containing page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still prefere not to use flash and that stuff if it is not readed. Traditional valid HTML pages (even generated by PHP,ASP) and so on are still better for google than any flash containing page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freshlogics</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-53395</link>
		<dc:creator>Freshlogics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-53395</guid>
		<description>It sounds good, can i have example of any site that has got good rank in google with this technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds good, can i have example of any site that has got good rank in google with this technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiteRanks</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43942</link>
		<dc:creator>SiteRanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43942</guid>
		<description>Great Tutorial!

While Flash is still a tricky (and expensive) thing, is this method a nice way to solve the problem of an alternative HTML version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Tutorial!</p>
<p>While Flash is still a tricky (and expensive) thing, is this method a nice way to solve the problem of an alternative HTML version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43538</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43538</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hi Andy,
sIFR looks good, but do you know people using that? (I know at least Tim using SWFObject ;))

They have a list with sites using their object, but the first 5 I checked doesn't use it anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hi Andy,sIFR looks good, but do you know people using that? (I know at least Tim using SWFObject ;))They have a list with sites using their object, but the first 5 I checked doesn&#8217;t use it anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43483</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43483</guid>
		<description>From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiteVoter Link Community</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43294</link>
		<dc:creator>SiteVoter Link Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43294</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Get your Flash website high ranked at Google...&lt;/strong&gt;

Adobe Flash is still "the" development platform to create rich media websites with great animations and sound effects. The bad thing is that search engines can't read the .swf format, but there is an alternative: SWFObject....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Get your Flash website high ranked at Google&#8230;</strong>Adobe Flash is still &#8220;the&#8221; development platform to create rich media websites with great animations and sound effects. The bad thing is that search engines can&#8217;t read the .swf format, but there is an alternative: SWFObject&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
