<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get your Flash website high ranked at Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/</link>
	<description>Read about Website Development, Online Marketing and Web Hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Consult</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-95233</link>
		<dc:creator>Consult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-95233</guid>
		<description>I still prefere not to use flash and that stuff if it is not readed. Traditional valid HTML pages (even generated by PHP,ASP) and so on are still better for google than any flash containing page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still prefere not to use flash and that stuff if it is not readed. Traditional valid HTML pages (even generated by PHP,ASP) and so on are still better for google than any flash containing page</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freshlogics</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-53395</link>
		<dc:creator>Freshlogics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-53395</guid>
		<description>It sounds good, can i have example of any site that has got good rank in google with this technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds good, can i have example of any site that has got good rank in google with this technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiteRanks</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43942</link>
		<dc:creator>SiteRanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43942</guid>
		<description>Great Tutorial!

While Flash is still a tricky (and expensive) thing, is this method a nice way to solve the problem of an alternative HTML version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Tutorial!</p>
<p>While Flash is still a tricky (and expensive) thing, is this method a nice way to solve the problem of an alternative HTML version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olaf</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43538</link>
		<dc:creator>Olaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43538</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hi Andy,
sIFR looks good, but do you know people using that? (I know at least Tim using SWFObject ;))

They have a list with sites using their object, but the first 5 I checked doesn&#039;t use it anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Hi Andy,<br />
sIFR looks good, but do you know people using that? (I know at least Tim using SWFObject <img src='http://cdn.web-development-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>They have a list with sites using their object, but the first 5 I checked doesn&#8217;t use it anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43483</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 23:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web-development-blog.com/archives/get-your-flash-website-high-ranked-at-google/#comment-43483</guid>
		<description>From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have read, using sIFR is a much better option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 26/36 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 413/417 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.web-development-blog.com

Served from: www.web-development-blog.com @ 2012-02-08 10:42:49 -->
